Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kochel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kochel

529 A.2d 1075, 515 Pa. 449, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 907

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 23, 1987·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 1987, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated November 7,1986, and the respondent’s Exceptions and Petition for Review of the said Report and Recommendation, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent, JOHN E. KOCHEL, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of the Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board [450]*450pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. The further request for oral argument is denied.

LARSEN, J., files a dissenting opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 1987, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated November 7,1986, and the respondent’s Exceptions and Petition for Review of the said Report and Recommendation, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent, JOHN E. KOCHEL, be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of the Commonwealth for a period of three months, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board [450]*450pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E. The further request for oral argument is denied.

LARSEN, J., files a dissenting opinion.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kochel, 529 A.2d 1075, 515 Pa. 449, 1987 Pa. LEXIS 907 (Pa. 1987).

Pincite

529 A.2d 1075 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kochel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related