Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klarman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klarman

901 A.2d 471

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 15, 2006

DocketNo. 1063 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 471 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klarman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klarman, 901 A.2d 471 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2006, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated April 4, 2006, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that Marie Elena Klarman is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day retroactive to January 16, 2006, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2006, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated April 4, 2006, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted pursuant to Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that Marie Elena Klarman is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day retroactive to January 16, 2006, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 A.2d 471, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-klarman-pa-2006.