Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas

770 N.E.2d 73, 96 Ohio St. 3d 1201

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 4, 2002

DocketNo. 2000-1109

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 770 N.E.2d 73 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas, 770 N.E.2d 73, 96 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Monica Ann Hansen Klaas, Attorney Registration No. 0065095, last known business address in Millersburg, Ohio.

{¶2} The court coming now to consider its order of February 21, 2001, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Monica Ann Hansen Klaas be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 86, 742 N.E.2d 612.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI