Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kealoha

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 3, 2019
DocketSCAD-19-0000473
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kealoha (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kealoha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kealoha, (haw 2019).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 03-JUL-2019 01:35 PM

SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

KATHERINE PUANA KEALOHA (HI Bar #6691), Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Case No. 17-O-026)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION

Upon consideration of the July 1, 2019 petition for the

immediate restraint of the license to practice law in this

jurisdiction held by Respondent Katherine Puana Kealoha, filed by

the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) pursuant to Rule 2.13 of

the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i (RSCH),

this court notes the exhibits attached to the petition include

the findings of guilt entered by the jury in United States of

America v. Katherine P. Kealoha, Criminal No. 17-CR-00582-JMS-WRP

(D. Haw.) and the indictment, which clearly establishes the

crimes of which Respondent Kealoha was convicted involved dishonesty, and further notes that at least three of the counts

of which Respondent Kealoha was convicted constitute felonies.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ODC’s petition is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Kealoha is

immediately restrained from the practice of law in this

jurisdiction, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.13(b), pending final

disposition of a disciplinary proceeding based on the findings of

guilt.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that this matter is hereby

referred to the Disciplinary Board of the Hawai#i Supreme Court

for institution of formal disciplinary proceedings, to be

convened once these convictions become final, as defined in RSCH

Rule 2.13(d). The sole issue to be determined at those hearings

shall be the discipline to be imposed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 3, 2019.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kealoha, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-kealoha-haw-2019.