Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay

662 N.E.2d 351, 75 Ohio St. 3d 397
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 10, 1996·No. No. 95-2129·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court agrees with the findings and recommendations of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Young, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay, 662 N.E.2d 351, 75 Ohio St. 3d 397 (Ohio 1996).

662 N.E.2d 351 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Kay
1996 Ohio 216 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1996)