Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 2, 2012
DocketSCAD-12-0000713
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura, (haw 2012).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000713 02-OCT-2012 08:15 AM

NO. SCAD-12-0000713

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

ROBERT D. KAWAMURA, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC 07-034-8494)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of

the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of

Hawai'i, the stipulated facts, and the evidence in the record, it

appears Respondent Robert D. Kawamura neglected a client matter

for nineteen months, to the potential injury of the client’s

claim, in violation of Rules 1.3 and 8.4(a) of the Hawai'i Rules

of Professional Conduct. It further appears that Respondent

Kawamura cooperated fully with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel

(ODC) in its investigation and disciplinary proceedings, but that

the investigation and disciplinary proceedings were delayed for a

period in excess of four years through no fault of Respondent Kawamura’s. It further appears Respondent Kawamura has a

heretofore unblemished disciplinary record and has expressed

remorse for his actions. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Robert D. Kawamura

is publicly censured, pursuant to Rule 2.3(a)(3) of the Rules of

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Kawamura shall

pay all costs of the proceedings, as approved upon a timely

submission of a bill of costs, as prescribed by RSCH Rule 2.3(c).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 2, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Kawamura, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-kawamura-haw-2012.