Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

841 A.2d 1036

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 3, 2004

DocketNo. 892 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 841 A.2d 1036 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones, 841 A.2d 1036 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW,' this 3rd day of February, 2004, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from a disabling condition by reason of illness which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to a complaint of professional misconduct brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 92 DB 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that Jonathan E. Jones is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E. for an [1037]*1037indefinite period and until further Order of this Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony and any further proceedings necessary pursuant to Rule 301, Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW,' this 3rd day of February, 2004, upon consideration of the Certificate of Admission of Disability by Attorney that the respondent-attorney is suffering from a disabling condition by reason of illness which makes it impossible for him to prepare an adequate defense to a complaint of professional misconduct brought against him in connection with Disciplinary Board Docket No. 92 DB 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that Jonathan E. Jones is immediately transferred to inactive status pursuant to Rule 301(e), Pa.R.D.E. for an [1037]*1037indefinite period and until further Order of this Court. Respondent shall comply with Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E. All pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent-attorney shall be held in abeyance, except for the perpetuation of testimony and any further proceedings necessary pursuant to Rule 301, Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

841 A.2d 1036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-jones-pa-2004.