Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

528 N.E.2d 190, 38 Ohio St. 3d 338, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 292
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 7, 1988·No. No. D.D. 87-33·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court has thoroughly reviewed the instant record [340] and has found ample support for the board’s conclusions. We therefore adopt the board’s findings as well as its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for an indefinite period to commence on the date of this decision. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones, 528 N.E.2d 190, 38 Ohio St. 3d 338, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 292 (Ohio 1988).

528 N.E.2d 190 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones
2000 Ohio 29 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones
737 N.E.2d 24 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)