Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones

528 N.E.2d 190, 38 Ohio St. 3d 338, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 292
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 7, 1988
DocketNo. D.D. 87-33
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 528 N.E.2d 190 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones, 528 N.E.2d 190, 38 Ohio St. 3d 338, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 292 (Ohio 1988).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This court has thoroughly reviewed the instant record [340]*340and has found ample support for the board’s conclusions. We therefore adopt the board’s findings as well as its recommendation. Respondent is hereby ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for an indefinite period to commence on the date of this decision. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones
2000 Ohio 29 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Jones
737 N.E.2d 24 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)
In re Corrigan
546 N.E.2d 1315 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 N.E.2d 190, 38 Ohio St. 3d 338, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-jones-ohio-1988.