Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James

889 A.2d 1208, 586 Pa. 41, 79 Pa. D. & C.4th 107, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 5

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 5, 2006

DocketNo. 1088 DISC 3

StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 1208 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James, 889 A.2d 1208, 586 Pa. 41, 79 Pa. D. & C.4th 107, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 5 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2006, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board dated November 4, 2005, the Joint Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is hereby granted in accordance with Rule 215(g), Pa.R.D.E., and it is

ORDERED that Janeane Michelle James is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of eighteen months, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.

Respondent is further directed to make restitution of $1,017.00 to Darlene Price and $950.00 to Allen B. Diggs within thirty days from the date of this Order.

Former Justice Nigro did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI