Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James

652 N.E.2d 974, 73 Ohio St. 3d 289
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 1995·No. No. 95-768·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is hereby suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James, 652 N.E.2d 974, 73 Ohio St. 3d 289 (Ohio 1995).

652 N.E.2d 974 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. James
1995 Ohio 318 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)