Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hollywood

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hollywood

868 A.2d 1193

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 31, 2005

DocketNo. 678 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 868 A.2d 1193 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hollywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hollywood, 868 A.2d 1193 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2005, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated December 15, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that Joseph Cletus Hollywood is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f)(5), Pa.R.D.E., until further definitive action by this Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the' provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 31st day of January, 2005, upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board dated December 15, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that Joseph Cletus Hollywood is placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f)(5), Pa.R.D.E., until further definitive action by this Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the' provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa.R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 A.2d 1193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hollywood-pa-2005.