Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hickey

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hickey

896 A.2d 1160

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 27, 2006·No. No. 829 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 20, 2005, it is hereby

ORDERED that JAMES A. HICKEY be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, to run consecutive to the suspension imposed by this Court on December 13, 2004.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of February, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated October 20, 2005, it is hereby

ORDERED that JAMES A. HICKEY be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, to run consecutive to the suspension imposed by this Court on December 13, 2004.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hickey, 896 A.2d 1160 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

896 A.2d 1160 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hickey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.