Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heisterkamp

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heisterkamp

670 A.2d 1124
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 28, 1995
DocketNo. 917 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board Nos. 29 DB 93 and 36 DB 94
StatusPublished

This text of 670 A.2d 1124 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heisterkamp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Heisterkamp, 670 A.2d 1124 (Pa. 1995).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 28th day of December, 1995, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 16,1995, it is hereby

ORDERED that Laura Vanderbilt Heist-erkamp be and she is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of five (5) years, retroactive to March 30, 1993, and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CASTILLE, J., dissents and would issue a Rule to Show Cause why respondent should not be disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 A.2d 1124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-heisterkamp-pa-1995.