Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hazel
This text of 746 A.2d 606 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hazel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2000, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on January 20, 2000, to show cause why the Order of this Court entered on January 12,1999, imposing probation should not be modified and a Consent to Suspension having been filed, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, respondent’s probation is revoked, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay the expenses of the investigation and prosecution of the revocation proceedings pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
746 A.2d 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hazel-pa-2000.