Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie
505 N.E.2d 261, 29 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29 Ohio B. 380, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239
Opinion
Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-102(A)(3) and (5). This court hereby orders that the respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
It is further ordered that the costs of these proceedings be taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie, 505 N.E.2d 261, 29 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29 Ohio B. 380, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239 (Ohio 1987).
505 N.E.2d 261 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Disciplinary Counsel v. Young
807 N.E.2d 317 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Heard
106 B.R. 481 (N.D. Ohio, 1989)
In Re Derryberry
72 B.R. 874 (N.D. Ohio, 1987)