Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie

505 N.E.2d 261, 29 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29 Ohio B. 380, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 18, 1987
DocketD.D. No. 86-34
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 505 N.E.2d 261 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie, 505 N.E.2d 261, 29 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29 Ohio B. 380, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239 (Ohio 1987).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-102(A)(3) and (5). This court hereby orders that the respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

It is further ordered that the costs of these proceedings be taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Young
2004 Ohio 1809 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)
In Re Heard
106 B.R. 481 (N.D. Ohio, 1989)
In Re Derryberry
72 B.R. 874 (N.D. Ohio, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 N.E.2d 261, 29 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29 Ohio B. 380, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hastie-ohio-1987.