Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie
This text of 505 N.E.2d 261 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-102(A)(3) and (5). This court hereby orders that the respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.
It is further ordered that the costs of these proceedings be taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
505 N.E.2d 261, 29 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29 Ohio B. 380, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hastie-ohio-1987.