Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris

701 N.E.2d 682, 84 Ohio St. 3d 3
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 1998
DocketNo. 98-719
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 N.E.2d 682 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris, 701 N.E.2d 682, 84 Ohio St. 3d 3 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris
1998 Ohio 686 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 N.E.2d 682, 84 Ohio St. 3d 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-harris-ohio-1998.