Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hanselmann

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hanselmann

871 A.2d 787

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 24, 2005

DocketNo. 931 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 871 A.2d 787 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hanselmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hanselmann, 871 A.2d 787 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2005, there having been filed with this Court by Fredrick C. Hanselmann his verified Statement of Resignation dated January 31, 2005, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth [788]*788of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Fredrick C. Hanselmann be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, retroactive to September 23, 2004, and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of March, 2005, there having been filed with this Court by Fredrick C. Hanselmann his verified Statement of Resignation dated January 31, 2005, stating that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth [788]*788of Pennsylvania in accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is

ORDERED that the resignation of Fredrick C. Hanselmann be and it is hereby accepted and he is DISBARRED ON CONSENT from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, retroactive to September 23, 2004, and it is further ORDERED that he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

871 A.2d 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hanselmann-pa-2005.