Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hamo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hamo

901 A.2d 472

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 18, 2006

DocketNo. 1056 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 901 A.2d 472 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hamo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hamo, 901 A.2d 472 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2006, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, George R. Hamo, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated December 1, 2005, for a period of 120 days, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, George R. Hamo is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2006, on certification by the Disciplinary Board that the respondent, George R. Hamo, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated December 1, 2005, for a period of 120 days, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, George R. Hamo is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

901 A.2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hamo-pa-2006.