Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

893 A.2d 66, 586 Pa. 263, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 8

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 5, 2006

DocketNo. 376 DISC 3

StatusPublished

This text of 893 A.2d 66 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer, 893 A.2d 66, 586 Pa. 263, 2006 Pa. LEXIS 8 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated September 29, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that PAUL L. HAMMER be and he is DISBARRED from the Bar of this Commonwealth retroactive to October 13, 2004, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Former Justice Nigro did not participate in this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI