Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

862 A.2d 74

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 13, 2004

DocketNo. 376 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 862 A.2d 74 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer, 862 A.2d 74 (Pa. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2004, respondent having failed to comply with the Order entered by this Court on August 12, 2004, it is

ORDERED that respondent is hereby placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f)(5), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Further, Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to consider respondent’s conduct at the September 10, 2004, proceeding in any subsequently filed Petition for Discipline.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2004, respondent having failed to comply with the Order entered by this Court on August 12, 2004, it is

ORDERED that respondent is hereby placed on temporary suspension pursuant to Rule 208(f)(5), Pa.R.D.E., and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Further, Office of Disciplinary Counsel is directed to consider respondent’s conduct at the September 10, 2004, proceeding in any subsequently filed Petition for Discipline.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

862 A.2d 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hammer-pa-2004.