Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer

735 A.2d 72, 557 Pa. 541, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 2274

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJuly 15, 1999

DocketNo. 376 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 735 A.2d 72 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hammer, 735 A.2d 72, 557 Pa. 541, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 2274 (Pa. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1999, upon consideration of the Remand Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 10, 1999, Respondent’s Objections and response thereto, it is hereby

[542]*542ORDERED that Paul L. Hammer be subjected to public censure by the Supreme Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 15th day of July, 1999, upon consideration of the Remand Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 10, 1999, Respondent’s Objections and response thereto, it is hereby

[542]*542ORDERED that Paul L. Hammer be subjected to public censure by the Supreme Court. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

735 A.2d 72, 557 Pa. 541, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 2274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-hammer-pa-1999.