Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gwyn

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gwyn

640 N.E.2d 1141, 71 Ohio St. 3d 8

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 16, 1994

DocketNo. 94-1371

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 640 N.E.2d 1141 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gwyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gwyn, 640 N.E.2d 1141, 71 Ohio St. 3d 8 (Ohio 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After careful review of the record, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, Peter D. Gwyn is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents and would suspend respondent for one year, stayed on the condition of no further misconduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After careful review of the record, we adopt the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Accordingly, Peter D. Gwyn is hereby publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 1-102(A)(4) and 6-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents and would suspend respondent for one year, stayed on the condition of no further misconduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

640 N.E.2d 1141, 71 Ohio St. 3d 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-gwyn-ohio-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack