Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gunnoe

680 N.E.2d 974, 79 Ohio St. 3d 191
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 16, 1997
DocketNo. 97-435
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 680 N.E.2d 974 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gunnoe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gunnoe, 680 N.E.2d 974, 79 Ohio St. 3d 191 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gunnoe
1997 Ohio 170 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
680 N.E.2d 974, 79 Ohio St. 3d 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-gunnoe-ohio-1997.