Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gumpel

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedApril 29, 2021
Docket15404
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gumpel (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gumpel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gumpel, (haw 2021).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court 15404 29-APR-2021 08:19 AM Dkt. 48 ORD

NO. 15404

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

KATHY J. GUMPEL, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 89-174-2698, 89-225-2749, 90-054-2872)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the April 22, 2021 motion, filed

by Bradley Tamm as Trustee Administrator at the Office of

Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), pursuant to both Rule 2.20 of the

Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi (RSCH) (1991)

and RSCH Rule 2.20 (2021), to cull the unclaimed client files

remaining from the practice of incapacitated attorney Kathy J.

Gumpel for all legally operative original documents or other

documents of value, and to thereafter destroy the remainder of

the files, and upon a review of the record in this matter, which

is more than 30 years old, we conclude the motion is justified.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted.

Trustee Administrator Tamm shall cull any files in ODC’s

possession related to attorney Gumpel’s former practice and shall

scan and upload into the electronic record of this case those

documents identified as legally operative, original documents or

other documents of value, or seek further instructions from this

court should such electronic preservation prove impractical.

Tamm thereafter may, at his discretion, proceed with the secure

destruction of the remaining client documents in this

trusteeship.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 29, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gumpel, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-gumpel-haw-2021.