Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerrero

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJune 22, 2012
DocketSCAD-12-0000180
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerrero (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerrero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerrero, (haw 2012).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000180 22-JUN-2012 11:34 AM NO. SCAD-12-0000180

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

EMMANUEL G. GUERRERO, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC 10-061-8895)

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, and McKenna, JJ.,

Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura,

in place of Acoba, J., recused,

and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Reifurth,

assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i and the record, it appears: (1) that Respondent Emmanuel G. Guerrero (Guerrero) requested and was granted a deferred

acceptance of a no-contest plea to three misdemeanor counts of

willful failure to file a general excise tax return, in violation

of HRS § 237-33 (2001); (2) that based on Guerrero's fulfillment

of the conditions of the deferred acceptance plea, the district

court dismissed the charges; (3) that the Office of Disciplinary

Counsel and Guerrero, who was represented by counsel, entered

into a "Proposed Stipulation of Facts, Conclusions of Law, and

Recommendation for Discipline" (Proposed Stipulation), in which

they agreed to stipulated facts, conclusions of law, factors in

aggravation and mitigation, and a recommendation for discipline

of the imposition of a public censure by this court; (4) that the Disciplinary Board, with minor changes, accepted and adopted the Proposed Stipulation and recommends that we impose the sanction of public censure upon Guerrero; (5) that Respondent Guerrero’s actions constitute violations of Rules 8.4(a) and (b) of the Hawai'i Rules of Professional Conduct; (6) in mitigation, Respondent Guerrero promptly informed the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, provided full cooperation, implemented measures to avoid a reoccurrence of the violations, and has performed significant pro bono work in the community; and (7) that public censure is warranted, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Emmanuel Guerrero is publicly censured, pursuant to Rule 2.3(a)(3) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Guerrero shall

pay all costs of the proceedings, as approved upon a timely

submission of a bill of costs, as prescribed by RSCH Rule 2.3(c).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 22, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Craig H. Nakamura

/s/ Lawrence M. Reifurth

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 237-33
Hawaii § 237-33

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerrero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-guerrero-haw-2012.