Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerra

642 A.2d 478
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 27, 1994
DocketNo. 974 Disciplinary Docket No. 2; Disciplinary Board Nos. 43 DB 91 and 20 DB 92
StatusPublished

This text of 642 A.2d 478 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Guerra, 642 A.2d 478 (Pa. 1994).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 1994, a Rule having been entered upon respondent by this Court on October 28, 1993, to show cause why he should not be disbarred and service of that Rule not having been able to be made upon respondent as a result of his failure to comply with Rule 219, Pa.R.D.E., it is hereby

ORDERED that the Rule is made absolute, Edgar Saez Guerra is disbarred from the Bar of this Commonwealth and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

FRANK J. MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation as Senior Justice pursuant to Judicial Assignment Docket No. 94 R1800, due to the unavailability of LARSEN, J., see No. 127 Judicial Administration Docket No. 1, filed October 28, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 A.2d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-guerra-pa-1994.