Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grimes
614 N.E.2d 740, 66 Ohio St. 3d 607
Opinions
We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grimes, 614 N.E.2d 740, 66 Ohio St. 3d 607 (Ohio 1993).
614 N.E.2d 740 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bahan (Slip Opinion)
2022 Ohio 1210 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2022)
Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey and Bailey (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 3701 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Shenise
34 N.E.3d 910 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)
Akron Bar Assn. v. DiCato
2011 Ohio 5796 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pullins
2010 Ohio 6241 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner
793 N.E.2d 425 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)