Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grimes

614 N.E.2d 740, 66 Ohio St. 3d 607
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 7, 1993
DocketNo. 93-455
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 614 N.E.2d 740 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grimes, 614 N.E.2d 740, 66 Ohio St. 3d 607 (Ohio 1993).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

We find that respondent committed the misconduct found by the board and concur with its recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bahan (Slip Opinion)
2022 Ohio 1210 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2022)
Erie-Huron Cty. Bar Assn. v. Bailey and Bailey (Slip Opinion)
2020 Ohio 3701 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2020)
Akron Bar Ass'n v. Shenise
34 N.E.3d 910 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2015)
Akron Bar Assn. v. DiCato
2011 Ohio 5796 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Pullins
2010 Ohio 6241 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gardner
793 N.E.2d 425 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 N.E.2d 740, 66 Ohio St. 3d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-grimes-ohio-1993.