Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith

737 N.E.2d 1284, 90 Ohio St. 3d 310
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 2000
DocketNo. 00-840
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 737 N.E.2d 1284 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith, 737 N.E.2d 1284, 90 Ohio St. 3d 310 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. We hereby suspend respondent from the practice of law for two years and stay eighteen months of the suspension, with the stay conditioned on respondent’s cooperation with the Ohio Lawyers Assistance Program and on respondent’s working with a monitor, to be appointed by relator. Failure to satisfy these conditions will result in the reinstatement of respondent’s stayed suspension. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Griffith
2000 Ohio 80 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 N.E.2d 1284, 90 Ohio St. 3d 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-griffith-ohio-2000.