Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided October 1, 2014·No. SCAD-13-0000134·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-13-0000134 01-OCT-2014 10:18 AM

SCAD-13-0000134

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

BURTON D. GOULD, Respondent.

----------------------------------------------------------------- In Re Application for Reinstatement of

BURTON D. GOULD, Applicant.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the September 18, 2014 affidavit

and supporting documents submitted by Respondent Burton Gould,

this court finds and concludes that Respondent Gould has

fulfilled the conditions of the July 18, 2013 order of this

court, reinstating him to the practice of law. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Gould’s petition

for reinstatement is completed. The clerk of the court shall

close SCAD-13-134 in the JIMS system.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 1, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould, (haw 2014).

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.