Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-13-0000134 01-OCT-2014 10:18 AM
SCAD-13-0000134
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
BURTON D. GOULD, Respondent.
----------------------------------------------------------------- In Re Application for Reinstatement of
BURTON D. GOULD, Applicant.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the September 18, 2014 affidavit
and supporting documents submitted by Respondent Burton Gould,
this court finds and concludes that Respondent Gould has
fulfilled the conditions of the July 18, 2013 order of this
court, reinstating him to the practice of law. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Gould’s petition
for reinstatement is completed. The clerk of the court shall
close SCAD-13-134 in the JIMS system.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 1, 2014.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gould, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-gould-haw-2014.