Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling

679 N.E.2d 1096, 79 Ohio St. 3d 113
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 25, 1997
DocketNo. 97-438
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 679 N.E.2d 1096 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling, 679 N.E.2d 1096, 79 Ohio St. 3d 113 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for twenty-four months, but twelve months of that suspension are stayed, provided that during [115]*115the two-year period respondent comply with the conditions recommended by the board. Costs are taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Perry
1999 Ohio 32 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling
715 N.E.2d 187 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher
1998 Ohio 592 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher
693 N.E.2d 1078 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling
1997 Ohio 177 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
679 N.E.2d 1096, 79 Ohio St. 3d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-gosling-ohio-1997.