Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling

679 N.E.2d 1096, 79 Ohio St. 3d 113
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 1997·No. No. 97-438·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law for twenty-four months, but twelve months of that suspension are stayed, provided that during [115]*115the two-year period respondent comply with the conditions recommended by the board. Costs are taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling, 679 N.E.2d 1096, 79 Ohio St. 3d 113 (Ohio 1997).

679 N.E.2d 1096 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Perry
1999 Ohio 32 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling
715 N.E.2d 187 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1999)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher
1998 Ohio 592 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gallagher
693 N.E.2d 1078 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gosling
1997 Ohio 177 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)