Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Goldman

880 A.2d 1233, 584 Pa. 115, 78 Pa. D. & C.4th 538, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2003

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 30, 2005·No. No. 1040 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 20, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that HOWARD GOLDMAN be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

[116] It is further ORDERED that the expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this matter are to be paid by the Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of August, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated May 20, 2005, the Petition for Review and response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that HOWARD GOLDMAN be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of one year and one day, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

[116] It is further ORDERED that the expenses incurred in the investigation and prosecution of this matter are to be paid by the Respondent.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Goldman, 880 A.2d 1233, 584 Pa. 115, 78 Pa. D. & C.4th 538, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2003 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

880 A.2d 1233 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.