Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Glover

637 N.E.2d 300, 70 Ohio St. 3d 80
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 24, 1994·No. No. 94-520·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in this state. She may not apply for reinstatement until she submits proof of reinstatement in Pennsylvania and the District of Columbia. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Glover, 637 N.E.2d 300, 70 Ohio St. 3d 80 (Ohio 1994).

637 N.E.2d 300 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Glover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Glover
1994 Ohio 9 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)