Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel

564 N.E.2d 84, 56 Ohio St. 3d 58, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1719
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 12, 1990
DocketNo. 90-1125
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 564 N.E.2d 84 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel, 564 N.E.2d 84, 56 Ohio St. 3d 58, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1719 (Ohio 1990).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball
618 N.E.2d 159 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball
1993 Ohio 6 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
564 N.E.2d 84, 56 Ohio St. 3d 58, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 1719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-giegel-ohio-1990.