Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giba

880 A.2d 1208, 584 Pa. 73, 76 Pa. D. & C.4th 556, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1967

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 16, 2005·No. No. 1021 Disciplinary Docket No. 3·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated March 23, 2005, it is hereby

[74]*74ORDERED that PAUL ROBERT GIBA be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated March 23, 2005, it is hereby

[74]*74ORDERED that PAUL ROBERT GIBA be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of two years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giba, 880 A.2d 1208, 584 Pa. 73, 76 Pa. D. & C.4th 556, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 1967 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

880 A.2d 1208 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.