Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys

737 N.E.2d 29, 90 Ohio St. 3d 250
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 25, 2000·No. No. 00-761·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years with the second year stayed. Respondent shall remain on probation for the entire two years under the following conditions: first, that he be subject to random testing, for drug or alcohol use; second, that he attend three Alcoholics Anonymous meetings each week and document such attendance; third, that he make quarterly visits to a psychologist; fourth, that an attorney appointed by the relator monitor these terms and conditions of probation and report compliance with them quarterly to the relator. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys, 737 N.E.2d 29, 90 Ohio St. 3d 250 (Ohio 2000).

737 N.E.2d 29 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Hennekes
850 N.E.2d 1201 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys
2000 Ohio 60 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)