Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys

737 N.E.2d 29, 90 Ohio St. 3d 250

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 25, 2000

DocketNo. 00-761

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 737 N.E.2d 29 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gettys, 737 N.E.2d 29, 90 Ohio St. 3d 250 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years with the second year stayed. Respondent shall remain on probation for the entire two years under the following conditions: first, that he be subject to random testing, for drug or alcohol use; second, that he attend three Alcoholics Anonymous meetings each week and document such attendance; third, that he make quarterly visits to a psychologist; fourth, that an attorney appointed by the relator monitor these terms and conditions of probation and report compliance with them quarterly to the relator. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for two years with the second year stayed. Respondent shall remain on probation for the entire two years under the following conditions: first, that he be subject to random testing, for drug or alcohol use; second, that he attend three Alcoholics Anonymous meetings each week and document such attendance; third, that he make quarterly visits to a psychologist; fourth, that an attorney appointed by the relator monitor these terms and conditions of probation and report compliance with them quarterly to the relator. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

737 N.E.2d 29, 90 Ohio St. 3d 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-gettys-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack