Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron

512 N.E.2d 954, 32 Ohio St. 3d 134, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 357

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 19, 1987

DocketD.D. No. 86-33

StatusPublished

This text of 512 N.E.2d 954 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Geron, 512 N.E.2d 954, 32 Ohio St. 3d 134, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 357 (Ohio 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having reviewed the record, the findings of fact, and conclusions of the board, this court determines that there are sufficient facts to justify the finding that Terry A. Geron did in fact violate DR 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), 7-101(A)(3), 1-102(A)(4), and 1-102(A)(6), and Gov. Bar R. VI(6).

Further, the disciplinary proceedings in both Indiana and Kentucky may be relied upon as further evidence of respondent’s unfitness to practice law. See Disciplinary Counsel v. Nothstein (1986), 21 Ohio St. 3d 108, 21 OBR 400, 488 N.E. 2d 180.

We concur in the recommendation of the board, and hereby indefinitely suspend respondent from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI