Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood

677 N.E.2d 1182, 78 Ohio St. 3d 304, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1002

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 30, 1997·No. No. 96-2480·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. As a condition of any possible reinstatement to the practice of law, respondent must make restitution and must demonstrate that he is continuing his treatment for depression or that treatment is no longer necessary. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. As a condition of any possible reinstatement to the practice of law, respondent must make restitution and must demonstrate that he is continuing his treatment for depression or that treatment is no longer necessary. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood, 677 N.E.2d 1182, 78 Ohio St. 3d 304, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1002 (Ohio 1997).

Pincite

677 N.E.2d 1182 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related