Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood

677 N.E.2d 1182, 78 Ohio St. 3d 304, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1002
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 30, 1997
DocketNo. 96-2480
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 677 N.E.2d 1182 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Gatwood, 677 N.E.2d 1182, 78 Ohio St. 3d 304, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1002 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon review of the record, we adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the board. Respondent is suspended indefinitely from the practice of law in Ohio. As a condition of any possible reinstatement to the practice of law, respondent must make restitution and must demonstrate that he is continuing his treatment for depression or that treatment is no longer necessary. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Gatwood
1998 Ohio 109 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Andrews
1997 Ohio 54 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 N.E.2d 1182, 78 Ohio St. 3d 304, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-gatwood-ohio-1997.