Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furusho
This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furusho (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furusho) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 27-JUN-2022 02:12 PM Dkt. 20 OSUS
SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,
vs.
CRAIG K. FURUSHO (Bar No. 1966), Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Case Nos. 20-0248, 20-0257, 21-0229)
ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)
Upon review of the May 3, 2022 petition, filed by the
Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), requesting this court,
pursuant to Rule 2.12A of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the
State of Hawai#i (RSCH), to require Respondent Craig K. Furusho
to show cause as to why he should not be immediately suspended
from the practice of law for failing to cooperate with ODC in its
lawful investigations into allegations of misconduct committed by
him, this court’s May 18, 2022 order to show cause, its May 31,
2022 amended order to show cause, the lack of a response from
Respondent Furusho, and the record in this matter, we conclude that granting the petition is warranted and supported by the
record. Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted.
Respondent Furusho is suspended from the practice of law,
effective immediately upon the filing of this order, and until
further order of this court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order imposing
suspension upon Respondent Furusho shall constitute a suspension
for the purposes of RSCH Rule 2.16. The Disciplinary Board of
the Hawai#i Supreme Court and Respondent Furusho shall therefore
comply with the relevant requirements of that Rule.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall forthwith
distribute a copy of this order to all judges, pursuant to RSCH
Rule 2.16(f). Distribution may be by electronic mail.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 27, 2022.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furusho, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-furusho-haw-2022.