Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fritz
This text of 704 A.2d 631 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fritz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 1998, an order and rule to show cause having been entered by this Court on December 16,1997, and upon consideration of the responses filed, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The Rule is made absolute and, pursuant to Rule 208(f), Pa.R.D.E., respondent, James Joseph Fritz, is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action by this Court;
2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E.;
3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, in accordance with Rule 217(g), Pa. R.D.E., shall take such further action and make such further orders as may be necessary to protect fully the rights and interests of respondent’s clients; and
4. All financial institutions in which respondent holds accounts shall freeze such accounts pending further Order of this Court.
This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of Rule 402, Pa. R.D.E., pertaining to confidentiality.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
704 A.2d 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-fritz-pa-1998.