Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedmann

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedmann

884 A.2d 888

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 27, 2005

DocketNo. 989 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 884 A.2d 888 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedmann, 884 A.2d 888 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2005, on certification by the Disciplinary [889]*889Board that the respondent, AARON S. FRIEDMANN, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated March 15, 2005, for a period of six months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, AARON S. FRIEDMANN is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 27th day of October, 2005, on certification by the Disciplinary [889]*889Board that the respondent, AARON S. FRIEDMANN, who was suspended by Order of this Court dated March 15, 2005, for a period of six months, has filed a verified statement showing compliance with all the terms and conditions of the Order of Suspension and Rule 217, Pa. R.D.E., and there being no other outstanding order of suspension or disbarment, AARON S. FRIEDMANN is hereby reinstated to active status, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

884 A.2d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-friedmann-pa-2005.