Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

643 N.E.2d 104, 71 Ohio St. 3d 217, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2912
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1994
DocketNo. DD 88-30
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 643 N.E.2d 104 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman, 643 N.E.2d 104, 71 Ohio St. 3d 217, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2912 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we concur in the findings and recommendation of the panel. B. Alan Freeman’s probation is revoked and his original six-month suspension is reinstated, but he is given credit for time served. He will not be reinstated until he pays the restitution to the Baileys in full. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Young, Resniok, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Gooch
250 B.R. 887 (S.D. Ohio, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
643 N.E.2d 104, 71 Ohio St. 3d 217, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-freeman-ohio-1994.