Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman

643 N.E.2d 104, 71 Ohio St. 3d 217, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2912
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1994·No. No. DD 88-30·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we concur in the findings and recommendation of the panel. B. Alan Freeman’s probation is revoked and his original six-month suspension is reinstated, but he is given credit for time served. He will not be reinstated until he pays the restitution to the Baileys in full. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Young, Resniok, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. William W. Young, J., of the Twelfth Appellate District, sitting for Wright, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman, 643 N.E.2d 104, 71 Ohio St. 3d 217, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 2912 (Ohio 1994).

643 N.E.2d 104 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Gooch
250 B.R. 887 (S.D. Ohio, 2000)