Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fogerty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fogerty

880 A.2d 1204

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 27, 2005

DocketNo. 900 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 880 A.2d 1204 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fogerty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fogerty, 880 A.2d 1204 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 25, 2005, it is hereby

ORDERED that JAMES MARTIN FOGERTY be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years retroactive to April [1205]*12058, 2004, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 27th day of May, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated February 25, 2005, it is hereby

ORDERED that JAMES MARTIN FOGERTY be and he is SUSPENDED from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years retroactive to April [1205]*12058, 2004, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

880 A.2d 1204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-fogerty-pa-2005.