Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd

Ohio Supreme Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd

660 N.E.2d 1150, 74 Ohio St. 3d 599

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 28, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2532

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 660 N.E.2d 1150 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Floyd, 660 N.E.2d 1150, 74 Ohio St. 3d 599 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but that suspension is held in abeyance and respondent is placed on probation for two years upon the conditions recommended by the [601]*601board. Restitution is to be made within ninety days from this order. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We concur with the board’s findings, conclusions of law, and recommendation. Accordingly, respondent is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, but that suspension is held in abeyance and respondent is placed on probation for two years upon the conditions recommended by the [601]*601board. Restitution is to be made within ninety days from this order. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Cook, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would publicly reprimand respondent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

660 N.E.2d 1150, 74 Ohio St. 3d 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-floyd-ohio-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack