Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher

653 A.2d 625, 539 Pa. 497

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 23, 1995·No. No. 698 Disciplinary Docket No. 2·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rule to Show Cause entered by this Court on May 4, 1994, is discharged. It is ORDERED that respondent be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, retroactive to January 30, 1990, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CASTILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

PAPADAKOS, J., dissents and would enter an order disbarring respondent.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Rule to Show Cause entered by this Court on May 4, 1994, is discharged. It is ORDERED that respondent be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, retroactive to January 30, 1990, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

CASTILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

PAPADAKOS, J., dissents and would enter an order disbarring respondent.

MONTEMURO, J., is sitting by designation.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher, 653 A.2d 625, 539 Pa. 497 (Pa. 1995).

Pincite

653 A.2d 625 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related