Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish

707 N.E.2d 851, 85 Ohio St. 3d 168
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 24, 1999
DocketNo. 98-1758
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 707 N.E.2d 851 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish, 707 N.E.2d 851, 85 Ohio St. 3d 168 (Ohio 1999).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson
865 N.E.2d 873 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Fish
2 S.W.3d 786 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 N.E.2d 851, 85 Ohio St. 3d 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-fish-ohio-1999.