Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish

707 N.E.2d 851, 85 Ohio St. 3d 168

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 24, 1999·No. No. 98-1758·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish, 707 N.E.2d 851, 85 Ohio St. 3d 168 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

707 N.E.2d 851 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.