Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fiddler

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 16, 2021
DocketSCAD-21-0000398
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fiddler (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fiddler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fiddler, (haw 2021).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX 16-JUL-2021 01:48 PM Dkt. 5 OGP SCAD-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

NOAH D. FIDDLER (HI Bar #3144), Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC Case No. 21-0131)

ORDER GRANTING PETITION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the July 1, 2021 petition for the

immediate restraint of the license to practice law in this

jurisdiction held by Respondent Noah D. Fiddler, filed by the

Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) pursuant to Rule 2.13 of the

Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi (RSCH), this

court notes the exhibits attached to the petition include the

granting on June 9, 2021 by the First Circuit Court, in State of

Hawaiʻi v. Fiddler, No. 1CPC-XX-XXXXXXX, of Fiddler’s motion for

the deferred acceptance of a guilty plea to five felony counts of

willful failure to collect and pay over a tax, in violation of

HRS § 231-36.4 (2010), and twelve misdemeanor counts of willful failure to file a return, in violation of HRS § 231-35 (2010),

all of which we conclude were crimes which involved dishonesty.

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ODC’s petition is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Fiddler is

immediately restrained from the practice of law in this

jurisdiction, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.13(b), pending final

disposition of a disciplinary proceeding based on the findings of

guilt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby

referred to the Disciplinary Board of the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court

for institution of formal disciplinary proceedings, to be

convened once these convictions become final, as defined in RSCH

Rule 2.13(d). The sole issue to be determined at those hearings

shall be the discipline to be imposed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 16, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 231-35
Hawaii § 231-35
§ 231-36.4
Hawaii § 231-36.4

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fiddler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-fiddler-haw-2021.