Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold

982 A.2d 1226, 603 Pa. 150, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2407
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 10, 2009
Docket145 EM 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 982 A.2d 1226 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold, 982 A.2d 1226, 603 Pa. 150, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2407 (Pa. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW’, this 10th day of November, 2009, the Motion to Allow Filing of Petition for Review Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
982 A.2d 1226, 603 Pa. 150, 2009 Pa. LEXIS 2407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-feingold-pa-2009.