Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold

896 A.2d 1161

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMarch 3, 2006

DocketNo. 1093 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 896 A.2d 1161 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Feingold, 896 A.2d 1161 (Pa. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2006, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 18, 2005, the Petition for Review, Exceptions and Objections and Petition for Remand, with request for oral argument, and response thereto, the request for oral argument is denied pursuant to Rule 208(e)(4), Pa.R.D.E., and it is hereby

ORDERED that Allen L. Feingold be and he is suspended from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of three years, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217 Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Justice BALDWIN did not participate in this matter. Justice CASTILLE dissents and would issue a Rule to Show Cause why respondent should not be disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI