Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Egami

CourtHawaii Supreme Court
DecidedJune 26, 2020
Docket21803
StatusPublished

This text of Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Egami (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Egami) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Egami, (haw 2020).

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court 21803 25-JUN-2020 10:36 AM

NO. 21803

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs.

TROY R. EGAMI, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 95-003-4462, 95-025-4484, 95-067-4526, 95-174-4633, 95-178- 4637, 95-263-4722, 95-306-4765, 95-307-4766, 96-051-4851, 96- 144-4944, 96-145-4945, 96-307-5107, 96-332,5132, 96-383-5183, 96-384-5184, 97-060-5254, 98-065-5556, 98-067-5558, 98-080-5571)

ORDER (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the June 22, 2020 motion and

accompanying exhibits filed by Bradley Tamm, Chief Disciplinary

Counsel at the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, as trustee over

the practice of former attorney Troy Egami, pursuant to Rule

2.20 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii

(RSCH), and the record in this matter, we conclude that the

purpose of the notice and waiting period set forth in RSCH Rule 2.20(d) has been fulfilled, and further conclude that no duties

or tasks remain for the trusteeship. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted. The

final report is approved.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Trustee Tamm may unfreeze

Egami’s personal account, ending in x007 held at Hawaii State

Federal Credit Union, for disposition as bank officers see fit.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Trustee Tamm is authorized,

upon entry of this order, to proceed forthwith with the

destruction of remaining client files held by the trusteeship,

save for original documents of value to Egami’s former clients,

pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.20(d).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tamm is discharged as

trustee, thirty days after the entry date of this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, June 25, 2020.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Egami, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-egami-haw-2020.