Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eagen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eagen

868 A.2d 1194

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedFebruary 1, 2005

DocketNo. 837 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 868 A.2d 1194 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eagen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eagen, 868 A.2d 1194 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 1, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that FRANCIS PETER EAGEN, III, be and he is DISBARRED from the Bar of this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 1st day of February, 2005, upon consideration of the Report and Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board dated November 1, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that FRANCIS PETER EAGEN, III, be and he is DISBARRED from the Bar of this Commonwealth, and he shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.

It is further ORDERED that respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

868 A.2d 1194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/office-of-disciplinary-counsel-v-eagen-pa-2005.